The New King James Version is based on the Antiochian manuscripts. Is it
an improvement over the King James Bible?
The New King James Version is to the English Bible what the Alexandrian
manuscripts are to Greek. A corruption of a pure text by
men who hold the deplorable doctrine that the Bible cannot be perfect (regardless
of what they may say when they preach) and must be corrected by the feeble
intellect of man.
The New King James Version unlike most modem translations is based on
the correct Antiochian manuscripts instead of the corrupt Alexandrian
manuscripts. Unfortunately, the men doing the translation work view the
Bible as imperfect. They would vehemently deny this charge in public
because their jobs depend on it, but in fact they do not believe that ANY
Bible is perfect. Not even their own New King James Version!
Thus, to them, the Bible is lost ("settled" in heaven) and the minds of
scholars are the only hope of rescuing its "thoughts" from oblivion.
Many of the men on the board of translator may indeed be great
preachers and pastors, but that by no means entitles them to correct the
Sincerity cannot improve on perfection. Thus, instead of making a good
thing better" they have only managed, for all of their trouble, to make a
"perfect thing tainted".
It must he remembered, there is a great deal of prestige in sitting on
the board of translators of a "modern" version of the Bible (Matthew